For Christmas I got a fascinating present from a good friend - my extremely own "best-selling" book.
"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has radiant reviews.
Yet it was totally written by AI, with a few easy triggers about me supplied by my buddy Janet.
It's a fascinating read, and uproarious in parts. But it likewise meanders quite a lot, and is someplace between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.
It imitates my chatty design of writing, however it's likewise a bit repeated, and very verbose. It might have exceeded Janet's triggers in looking at data about me.
Several sentences begin "as a leading innovation journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.
There's likewise a mystical, repetitive hallucination in the type of my cat (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.
There are lots of business online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.
When I called the primary executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had sold around 150,000 customised books, mainly in the US, because pivoting from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.
A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to generate them, based on an open source big language design.
I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who developed it, can order any additional copies.
There is currently no barrier to anyone developing one in any person's name, consisting of celebs - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent material. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer specifying that it is fictional, developed by AI, and created "exclusively to bring humour and delight".
Legally, the copyright comes from the company, but Mr Mashiach stresses that the item is planned as a "personalised gag gift", and the books do not get offered even more.
He wants to expand his variety, producing various genres such as sci-fi, and perhaps offering an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted kind of customer AI - offering AI-generated goods to human customers.
It's also a bit frightening if, like me, you write for a living. Not least due to the fact that it most likely took less than a minute to generate, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound similar to me.
Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually revealed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then produce comparable content based upon it.
"We should be clear, when we are speaking about data here, we in fact suggest human creators' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI companies to respect creators' rights.
"This is books, this is articles, this is pictures. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The whole point of AI training is to find out how to do something and after that do more like that."
In 2023 a song featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and vmeste-so-vsemi.ru they had actually not granted it. It didn't stop the track's creator attempting to nominate it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were fake, it was still wildly popular.
"I do not believe making use of generative AI for imaginative purposes ought to be prohibited, however I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on people's work without approval ought to be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be really effective but let's construct it ethically and fairly."
OpenAI says Chinese competitors utilizing its work for their AI apps
DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking
China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and damages America's swagger
In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have picked to block AI developers from trawling their online content for training purposes. Others have actually decided to work together - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for instance.
The UK government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would permit AI developers to use developers' material on the internet to help develop their designs, unless the rights holders pull out.
Ed Newton Rex explains this as "madness".
He explains that AI can make advances in locations like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.
"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and messing up the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.
Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is also highly against eliminating copyright law for AI.
"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million tasks and an entire lot of pleasure," states the Baroness, who is also an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.
"The federal government is undermining one of its finest carrying out industries on the vague pledge of development."
A federal government spokesperson stated: "No relocation will be made till we are definitely positive we have a practical plan that delivers each of our goals: increased control for right holders to help them license their content, access to top quality product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more openness for ideal holders from AI designers."
Under the UK federal government's new AI plan, a national data library consisting of public data from a large range of sources will likewise be provided to AI scientists.
In the US the future of federal rules to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.
In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to boost the safety of AI with, to name a few things, firms in the sector required to share details of the operations of their systems with the US federal government before they are launched.
But this has now been reversed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is stated to desire the AI sector to face less regulation.
This comes as a variety of lawsuits against AI firms, and particularly against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been gotten by everybody from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.
They declare that the AI firms broke the law when they took their material from the web without their authorization, and utilized it to train their systems.
The AI business argue that their actions fall under "fair use" and are for that reason exempt. There are a variety of elements which can constitute reasonable use - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it collects training information and whether it should be spending for it.
If this wasn't all sufficient to consider, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the previous week. It became one of the most downloaded free app on Apple's US App Store.
DeepSeek claims that it developed its innovation for a fraction of the cost of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's current dominance of the sector.
When it comes to me and a profession as an author, I believe that at the minute, if I really desire a "bestseller" I'll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weakness in generative AI tools for larger jobs. It has lots of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be quite difficult to read in parts due to the fact that it's so verbose.
But provided how quickly the tech is evolving, I'm not exactly sure how long I can stay confident that my substantially slower human writing and editing abilities, are better.
Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest advancements in international technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the world.
Outside the UK? Register here.