The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise appearances before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on unlawful gambling.

No, they weren't personally in presence, however the world-famous celebrities were conspicuously consisted of in a slide discussion on social and sweepstakes casinos - the controversial websites providing both complimentary casino-style games and rewarding rewards, such as money, gift cards or cryptocurrency. In one ad, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anyone can 'play for complimentary,' while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.

The sites are just 2 cogs in the multibillion-dollar industry that now discovers itself besieged by lawsuits. In the eyes of numerous gaming corporations, not to mention claim complainants and state regulators, sweepstakes gambling establishments act as traditional gambling establishments, just without the oversight, customer defenses and tax laws. So not only can they prevent the high 24-percent federal gaming levy, but sweepstakes operators aren't based on regulatory difficulties like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming protections.

One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in revenue last year alone. Now the company faces accusations of illegal gambling in a New york city claim that claims VGW utilizes celebrity endorsers to 'create a veneer of legitimacy' around its item. (See VGW's declaration listed below)

'I'm not sure" if you don't trust us, you can trust Paris Hilton" is a winning message for business operating multibillion-dollar unlawful operations out of places like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,' Friday's speaker, Howard Glaser of gaming corporation Light & Wonder, informed DailyMail.com.

Sweepstakes endorsers include a range of celebrities from sports betting enthusiasts Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, in addition to NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George - none of whom use any distinctions in between conventional gaming and sweepstakes play.

Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, among lots of sweepstakes casinos discovered online

Ryan Seacrest prompts fans to play at Chumba Casino, where many - however not all - video games are free

Drake has a deal with social sweeps casino, Stake, that he regularly touts on social media

Find out more

Donald Trump 'set to call NBA team owner as US ambassador to Italy'

Instead, ads normally focus around the social aspect of the gambling establishments, while omitting the capacity for real gambling losses.

Others tempt clients with promises of prizes. One such operator, Stake, ran a social networks ad showing off Drake's automobiles, aircrafts and estates before rotating to video of the rapper playing online casino-style video games.

'Daddy, why do we have so much cash?' check out the very first caption on the screen.

Another caption described: 'Because I never quit.'

The discrepancy in between gambling websites and social or sweepstakes gambling establishments is a bit intricate, but operators of the latter insist they're not involved with the previous.

A spokesperson for a market trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), described its members are not in direct competitors with online gambling establishments and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA data, the majority of the players on social-sweepstakes casinos are playing for complimentary.

'Most social sweeps clients never buy,' the SPGA spokesperson told DailyMail.com. 'The minority of customers who make purchases do so in quantities far smaller than the common deposit or wager size at real-money online gambling sites.'

Social casinos provide clients a possibility to play casino-style video games with good friends. Players have the choice to buy valueless currency often described as 'gold coins,' which can not be exchanged genuine cash, however can be utilized to unlock numerous functions within the games.

But within the world of social gambling establishments exists sweepstakes video gaming, permitting clients to obtain other currency understood as 'sweeps coins' that can be exchanged for money or other prizes.

And therein lies the capacity for monetary losses, like the ones claimed by complainants in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York. One player told the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes gambling establishments in the past year after continuing to buy more coins in pursuit of cash and other things of worth.

The Philadelphia 76ers' Paul George is seen promoting a Worldwide Poker event

Social sweeps casino Stake ran an advertisement displaying Drake's cars and trucks, airplanes and mansions

Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York City Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW's Global Poker

Traditional online casinos are banned in all but 7 states, which has actually assisted to sustain the popularity of sweepstakes casinos.

Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes websites, which do not require typically need identification. However, sites like Chumba will request IDs from gamers trying to withdraw any funds.

Many sites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, enable consumers to send mail-in requests for complimentary sweeps coins, offered the players follow painfully particular guidelines. What's more, players are typically rewarded with sweeps coins merely for signing up, therefore providing a factor to try their hands at any number of gambling establishment games for a possibility to win - or lose - real money.

So why are sweepstakes websites allowed to run in 48 states, while online casinos are banned in all but 7?

According to the stakeholders, their product is the totally free casino-style video gaming, and the real-stakes competitors is just a way of promoting their bread and butter.

'Social sweepstakes video games are simply a kind of online home entertainment,' an SPGA representative informed DailyMail.com by e-mail. 'No purchase is required to play at social gambling establishments with sweepstakes rewards. Consumers never have to spend for an opportunity to win prizes. That absence of a purchase requirement - or" factor to consider" - is a crucial distinction between social sweeps and conventional online gaming sites like gambling establishments.'

Think about the method that McDonald's utilizes its annual Monopoly video game to promote its food: Customers aren't paying to bet, however rather they're purchasing hamburgers and french fries that use them the opportunity to win profitable rewards, such as a $1 million jackpot.

And without a purchase requirement, or 'consideration', the video game itself doesn't meet the meaning of sports betting in the US.

'Sweepstakes are a long-standing technique for promoting all kinds of everyday companies in the United States, everything from burgers to publication subscriptions to coffee and home improvement stores,' the SPGA representative told DailyMail.com. 'Sweepstakes promotions are regularly utilized by a who's who of household names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.'

But to numerous sports betting industry insiders, that argument doesn't cut it.

For starters, video gaming attorney Daniel Wallach explains, McDonald's Monopoly game doesn't run indefinitely. Rather, it has a well-defined start and end, thereby suggesting the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant's primary item. Instead, the sweepstakes is being used to promote genuine items like fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.

'They do not last permanently and they're generally not tied to casino-style games of possibility,' Wallach told DailyMail.com. 'They're just money giveaways.

'The sweepstakes [casinos] possess none of the attributes commonly associated with McDonald's-design sweepstakes promos,' Wallach continued. 'Besides running in eternity, the sweepstakes casinos provide" casino-like" payments, generally 80 percent or more of incomes, whereas the common payout portion for a short-term marketing sweepstakes is a minor share of the profits earned by the company [generally less than one percent]'

Wallach fasts to compare the online social sweeps gambling establishments to the internet cafes that emerged in Florida, offering customers the chance to play casino-style games for real prizes. A number of those brick-and-mortar facilities have actually considering that been shuttered over accusations of prohibited gambling.

DJ Khaled is among numerous celeb spokespeople for VGW's Global Poker brand

Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps casinos ought to deal with similar examination.

'These distinctions are not arbitrary,' Wallach stated of social sweeps gambling establishments. 'They have actually consistently been pointed out by courts and state chief law officer as essential consider determining that a sweepstakes promo was in reality a guise for prohibited gaming.'

Among the casino market's leading trade companies, the American Gaming Association, is now pressing lawmakers to examine sweepstakes operators and, sometimes, enact new legislation on the issue.

'Consumers are being denied of defenses and states are forgoing considerable tax and income opportunities as this gambling changes that carried out through regulated channels,' checked out a well-circulated AGA memo.

And then there are the plaintiffs who have actually taken legal action against social casinos in more than a dozen states.

Sweepstakes gambling establishment operators paid a combined $14.2 million in 4 separate cases in Kentucky without confessing any misdeed, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW accepted pay $11.75 million in one class-action suit, saying the settlement was made to prevent legal expenses and continued lawsuits.

Michael Phelps has actually signed a deal with the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker

In the most recent suit, which is mostly similar to its predecessors, New york city state homeowners Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both declare to have actually lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is described in the filing as an 'unlawful gaming enterprise. '

Apple and Google have actually likewise been named as defendants in suits for hosting the sweepstakes websites. But unlike VGW, neither tech business reacted to DailyMail.com's ask for remark.

'We typically do not discuss matters before the courts,' a VGW spokesperson told DailyMail.com through e-mail. 'However, we note that this claim has only simply been submitted with the court and VGW has actually not been officially served.

'We have full self-confidence in our compliance with all laws and policies where we operate, and stay positive about the future,' the spokesperson continued. 'We continue to offer our free-to-play video games across most of North America, as we have for more than a decade, creating not just great video games, user experiences and home entertainment, however likewise ensuring this is done securely, properly and at the greatest level of requirements.

'More broadly, we 'd restate that class actions and other lawsuits and arbitrations are fairly common across the online social video games industry (and the US more broadly), and our standard practice is that we plan to intensely safeguard any claim which may be brought versus us.'

The concerns in between conventional online gaming and sweepstakes casinos might prove bothersome for some star endorsers.

Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers' George both endorse VGW's Global Poker brand while the NBA is partnered with standard video gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.

'It's paradoxical that professional athletes are hawking illegal sports betting 'sweeps' websites while at the very same time the leagues wish to predict a strong position versus prohibited gambling - particularly when attempting to tamp down the occasional sports betting scandal,' Glaser told DailyMail.com.

It was just 8 months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter got a life time ban from the NBA over accusations he conspired with gamblers. However, to be clear, Porter's scandal is unrelated to anything including social or sweepstakes gambling establishments.

Along with VGW, Apple and Google are being sued for hosting apparently unlawful sports betting websites

Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes casinos as a major issue for leagues such as the NBA.

'I 'd expect that a league crackdown on professional athletes endorsing sweepstakes sites is a matter of when, not if,' Glaser added.

Neither an NBA spokesman nor the players' agents reacted to DailyMail.com's demands for comment. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps also neglected to react to DailyMail.com emails.

Asked if their star endorsers have an obligation to explain to consumers the differences and resemblances in between iGaming and sweepstakes gambling establishments, VGW insisted there is nothing more that requires to be done.

'We have full confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial partnerships, and our organization practices more broadly,' the representative said. 'A few of our values are" our players come initially" and" we do what's right", and we put our worths at the core of everything we do.'

Glaser, an outspoken opponent of sweepstakes websites, sees things in a different way.

'Celebrities who lend their names to dubious unlawful gambling sites are, at a minimum, putting their track records at risk as well as courting civil and class actions by customers who declare harm,' Glaser stated. 'There is also some risk that state regulators and state lawyers basic rope celeb endorsers into enforcement efforts for facilitating illegal gaming.'

New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton